Lancia Beta Forum
November 25, 2024, 10:22:41 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: 2024 Events Calendar http://www.betaboyz.myzen.co.uk/forum/index.php?board=92.0
Please feel free to add more.
 
   Home   Help Contact Admin Search Calendar Gallery Articles Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Identifying Strut types  (Read 7811 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
RickyJ
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 42



« on: October 28, 2009, 05:40:22 PM »

A quick question on Suspension - Is there any way of identifying if I have the early-type insert struts on my car without removing the struts from the car?
I have an 84 VX Coupe, but I know that they were replaced at some point at Betacar several years ago. I need to replace the rears in the near future and it seems that inserts are more readily available than complete struts.
Logged
rossocorsa
Guest
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2009, 07:38:58 PM »

later cars from around the time of the series 2 fl1 era changed to sealed units vx's definitely came ex-factory with sealed units it is unlikely therefore that your car has refillable struts especially as most after market replacements over the years were full strut units. you could tell by looking at the top of the strut where the rod emerges and seeing if it has a collar or not in comparison on a sealed unit there is nothing obvious that you can unscrew
Logged
lanciamad
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lanciamad
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

England England

Posts: 699


Marcus Robinson


« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2009, 10:19:31 AM »

These are fronts but the same applies for the rears.
Sealed:

Non-Sealed:

With the car jacked up you should be able to feel which it has.
Logged

1982 - Lancia Beta HPE 2000ie http://www.betaboyz.myzen.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=472.0
1989 - Lancia Delta 16v integrale
1992 - Lancia Thema 2.0 16v Turbo
2001 - Honda Civic Type R EP3
rossocorsa
Guest
« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2009, 10:17:10 PM »

blimey they're rusty! Grin
Logged
RickyJ
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 42



« Reply #4 on: October 30, 2009, 06:27:54 PM »

Thanks Chaps - At least I know what I'm looking for now.
Logged
HFStuart
Legendary Member
******
Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 1942



« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2009, 06:53:41 PM »

blimey they're rusty! Grin

That's not rusty.

This is !

Logged
lanciamad
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lanciamad
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

England England

Posts: 699


Marcus Robinson


« Reply #6 on: October 30, 2009, 10:39:46 PM »

ooo nice  Cheesy
Logged

1982 - Lancia Beta HPE 2000ie http://www.betaboyz.myzen.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=472.0
1989 - Lancia Delta 16v integrale
1992 - Lancia Thema 2.0 16v Turbo
2001 - Honda Civic Type R EP3
Neil-yaj396
Legendary Member
******
Online Online

Posts: 1943


1979 1300 Coupe


« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2010, 04:09:03 PM »

I know that the rear struts on Coupes differ from those on saloon/HPE's (they're longer I think?), but can you actually fit saloon rear struts to a Coupe?

The reason I ask is that although my 1978 Coupe rides level, the NS strut looks noticably different to the OS one (shorter?) and I'm getting a bit of uneven tyre wear on the NSR wheel. Could be a historic bodge???

Neil
Logged
rossocorsa
Guest
« Reply #8 on: January 10, 2010, 04:36:21 PM »

I know that the rear struts on Coupes differ from those on saloon/HPE's (they're longer I think?), but can you actually fit saloon rear struts to a Coupe?

The reason I ask is that although my 1978 Coupe rides level, the NS strut looks noticably different to the OS one (shorter?) and I'm getting a bit of uneven tyre wear on the NSR wheel. Could be a historic bodge???

Neil

not 100% sure but anything is possible they probably would fit of a fashion the body of a coupe shocker is shorter not sure it would give uneven wear though having a hpe os strut. I'm fairly sure I've come across the opposite, hpe fitted with coupé strut, I suspect that the spring platform is in the same place it's the piece of strut above that differs  no doubt someone will come along that knows for certain
« Last Edit: January 10, 2010, 04:40:44 PM by rossocorsa » Logged
markwast
Guest
« Reply #9 on: January 11, 2010, 08:53:52 PM »

Yes the ditance obove the spring platform is different by approx 30mm . below that is the same.
Logged
bravo-v8
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 29


« Reply #10 on: January 12, 2010, 09:16:38 AM »

I have a set of rear leg S/H and Kayaba new cartridge for Beta coupé for sale, it's the solution to fit on late type Beta.

Eric
Logged
hongkongphooey
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 111


« Reply #11 on: January 27, 2010, 10:56:38 AM »

I have a set of rear leg S/H and Kayaba new cartridge for Beta coupé for sale, it's the solution to fit on late type Beta.

Eric

How much Eric?
Logged
echobravo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


HPE 2.0 i.e. and Beta Coupe 2000


« Reply #12 on: June 19, 2010, 09:49:12 PM »

I have a 1976 coupe, which should have the non-sealed type (I will check) does this mean that I do not have to get them converted to accept inserts?
Logged

ECHOBRAVO
Beta Coupé 2000 1976 x 3 | HPE 2.0. i.e. 1984 | Flavia 2000 Coupé 1969 x 3 | Fulvia Coupé 1.3s Rallye 1969 | Fulvia coupé 1.3s 1973
rossocorsa
Guest
« Reply #13 on: June 19, 2010, 10:13:22 PM »

yes but only if they are the originals if they've ever been replaced thre is a strong likelyhood that sealed units will have been fitted so check them first
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!